Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Newsweek Interview With Gen. Martin Luther Agwai on The UN/AU Peacekeeping Crisis in Darfur

THE LAST WORD: Gen. Martin Luther Agwai, Commander of the United Nations- African Union. Last week Agwai's peacekeeping mission in Darfur suffered a serious setback when unidentified rebel forces overran an AU base. He spoke with Newsweek about the difficulties of his mission and how to be a peacekeeper where peace does not yet exist. "We are here as peacekeepers, and our job would be easier and smoother if there were a peace deal brokered for us. Unfortunately, right now, there is no peace to keep. So it has become another Herculean task to see that people are protected," he says.

Force Dejection

Newsweek International

Oct. 15, 2007 issue - Gen. Martin Luther Agwai might have the toughest job in Africa. As commander of the new joint United Nations-African Union (AU) peacekeeping mission in Darfur, the former head of Nigeria's armed forces will lead the 26,000-strong force that will be deployed to the region next year. His mission suffered a serious setback last Saturday when unidentified rebel forces overran an AU base at Haskanita, leaving 10 of his troops dead. NEWSWEEK's Silvia Spring spoke with Agwai by telephone from Khartoum, where he was attending a ceremony honoring the dead AU forces, about the raid, the difficulties of his mission and how to be a peacekeeper where peace does not yet exist. Excerpts:

SPRING: This week, 10 AU soldiers were killed. How did a small rebel group manage to ambush these soldiers so successfully?

AGWAI: Where did you get this idea that it was a small rebel group? And these troops were not ambushed. They were attacked. Twice. The second time a large number of rebels overwhelmed the camp. Who these rebels were, I don't know.

What are the implications for your UN-AU force?

There are no implications. Right now, I don't have control over the AU troops. When my [AU-UN] troops arrive, then we'll resolve most of these problems. We are committed to staying, and I hope other countries will still allow their troops to come.

What are you most worried about right now?

A lack of troops. We're supposed to have 20,000 troops and 6,000 policemen. As of now, we don't even know the troop contributors. To be able to perform the task that is expected of us, that is what is my biggest challenge now. The resolution itself stated that by the end of August we would know all the troop contributors, and now we are at almost the end of September, and we don't know. So you see the whole program is running behind schedule.

Whom do you blame for the delays?

It would very difficult for me to sit here and apportion blame because I don't know what is happening behind the scenes. I don't know what challenges other people are facing, and I'm only looking at this from my own perspective. I have a job to perform, and there are resources that have to be given to me. I know if the resources are available, they will be given to me. I believe there must be challenges that all the parties are facing. I just hope that we will be able to resolve and find an answer to those challenges and that the troops arrive so we can save lives and property in this part of the world.

You've warned the international community not to set its expectations too high. Why?

The resolution that created this hybrid [peacekeeping] operation is not a secret document, so many people have read that the force is to have 20,000 troops. I have had telephone calls from different organizations and individuals congratulating me that I now have 20,000 troops. Unfortunately, as you and I know now, we don't even know the troop contributors, so how can we talk about what those troops will do? Those people who are calling me will see nothing happening on the ground and feel disappointed. That is why I have already cautioned people not to expect too much because there is not much happening on the ground.

So you're saying things aren't changing fast enough?

Definitely. I am very concerned. I accepted the job because I wanted to give it my best, and I can only give it my best and be judged by the world depending on the resources available to me. And the resources are not forthcoming. They are not giving me 20,000 [troops], not to mention the equipment the troops will use, not to mention the other staff we will need in the mission. Nothing. So I am really, really concerned.

Plus, there's no peace deal yet. How can you be expected to provide security when there's no peace deal?

Lack of peace on the ground is definitely another big challenge because we are here as peacekeepers, and our job would be easier and smoother if there were a peace deal brokered for us. Unfortunately, right now, there is no peace to keep. So it has become another Herculean task to see that people are protected. We hope the talks in Libya [scheduled to start Oct. 27] result in an acceptable, comprehensive peace agreement for us and for every party involved.

So you must be feeling pretty stressed out these days.

If it were my younger days, maybe I would have been very stressed, but I have taken some courses in stress management and read a book called "Stop Stressing and Start Sleeping." Now, instead of crying over spilt milk, I look at tomorrow and what I can achieve.

© 2007 Newsweek, Inc

If what Gen. Martin Luther Agwai said is true, then I am disappointed that the UN/AU cannot prove to be capable of ending the civil war in Sudan and save the millions of refugees who are still suffering and dying daily in Darfur and the borders of Chad.
How can the UN/AU continue to blame the ruling government of Sudan for the Darfur crisis when the UN/AU cannot even provide the required troops, equipment and logistics for the joint United Nations-African Union (AU) peacekeeping mission?
I blame the UN/AU for the preventable death of the 10 AU peacekeepers that were killed by unidentified rebel forces in a surprise attack on the AU base at Haskanita on Sunday, September 30, 2007.

The fact that, Gen. Martin Luther Agwai admitted that they could not identify the rebel forces opposed to the peacekeeping mission shows that the previous AU Peacekeeping mission failed. The first assignment of any military operation in any hostile territory is reconnaissance. The intelligence observers would have gone ahead of the troops and identify the agents of the conflict, their locations, positions, conditions, supplies and their weaknesses. Then, the intelligence report will be used for the blue prints of the main operations of the peacekeeping mission.

You do not send troops to the hostile territory without knowing your enemies and allies. Gen. Martin Luther Agwai would be more informed if he contacted Mr. Jan Pronk, the former UN Envoy to Sudan, who knew all the warring antagonists in the conflicts in Sudan. Jan Pronk’s intelligence report would be very useful to the commander of the peacekeeping mission.

It is unfortunate that strategic priorities are being misplaced in the joint United Nations-African Union Hybrid Peacekeeping Mission in Sudan.


Isaac Rowlett said...

Thanks for the post, but I take issue with your criticism of the UN/AU force itself. Is is not Agwai's fault that...

1. The GoS continues to obstruct the mobilization and deployment of UNAMID
2. The US, Japan, and various European nations have not followed through on their word to finacially and materially support UNAMID
3. His superiors in both the UN and the AU have not settled many of the issues related to UNAMID mobilization and deployment.

For more check out ENOUGH's latest paper at

Orikinla Osinachi. said...

Thank you for your informed commentary on this post.

I am not blaming the soldiers and their commanders. But the administrators of the UN/AU Mission in Sudan.

They should have made sure that everything required has been provided before sending the innocent soldiers into hostile territory. And lest we forget, this was not the first time that AU peacekeepers have been attacked and murdered by rebels in Darfur.

I have eye witness accounts of the Nigerian soldiers who were killed earlier.

The UN can end the civil war in Sudan if the UN is dealing with the crisis practically and not playing diplomatic games with millions of lives.

Cheers and God bless.

Orikinla Osinachi. said...

I have read the report on ENOUGH PROJECT and now you can see that the AU Commission Chairman Alpha Oumar Konare was wrong when he insisted on an all-African peacekeeping force and rejecting units from Uruguay, Thailand, and Norway.

As I said earlier before the Sudanese government allowed the UN/AU Hybrid peacekeeping force that the Sudanese government has no justification in dictating the composition of the UN/AU Peacekeeping Mission to Darfur.
The UN can bring Sudan to her knees.

Victoria said...

Hey! Your blog is great, I think it's great that you're tackling such an important issue. Check out this great opportunity I just found out about- the BR!CK Awards- at and help me pass on the word!

Orikinla Osinachi. said...

Thank you for reading.

I will do as you have asked right away.

Cheers and God bless you always.

Anonymous said...

Hi, I just wanted to get a little more information about you... My name is Ana and I am doing a paper on blogs... so I wanted to get in touch with you... my MSN is: or give me yours so I can write to you! =) thanks

Orikinla Osinachi. said...

I hope you have found enough information to write your paper on blogs?

I wish you all the best.

Cheers and God bless.

Andrea said...

I don't think that the UN thought their plan through. It's difficult enough to be there during such a dangerous time, let alone go there unequipped to handle their mission.